Comments on: Layered architecture with Hibernate and Spring 3

By: tejuvenkat

tejuvenkat — Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:56:51 +0000

Good one.

By: christopher

christopher — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:54:07 +0000

@Ale You no longer need the TransactionProxyFactoryBean since you already have @Transactional annotation.

By: Jacobiroba

Jacobiroba — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:36:42 +0000

Fantastic work! thanks.

By: Ignatius

Ignatius — Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:11:46 +0000

I have the same problem. It only works if the services (with @Transactional) are defined as beans in the xml.

Does this works with autowiring and @Service, @Repository… ?

By: Alex Rios

Alex Rios — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:36:43 +0000

Very good and lean post, thanks!

By: akash

akash — Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:19:13 +0000

very nice article, thanks…

By: Ale

Ale — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:19:29 +0000

Thanks…..very good article.
Only One question……….how can i use the TransactionProxyFactoryBean in this architecture?

By: User

User — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:39:29 +0000

A screenshot of project structure will be helpful.

By: SK

SK — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:35:06 +0000

Very useful. Summarized good. thanks.

By: Bo

Bo — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:30:56 +0000

I tried your example and created a controller to test it.

I got an exception “org.hibernate.HibernateException: No Hibernate Session bound to thread, and configuration does not allow creation of non-transactional one here” with the following code. How can I fix it without adding proxy-target-class=”true”? Thanks.

@Controller
public class MyController {

private UserService userService;

@Autowired
public MyController(UserService userService) {
this.userService = userService;
}

@RequestMapping(“/{page}”)
public ModelAndView category(@PathVariable String page) {
ModelAndView mav = new ModelAndView();
mav.addObject(“page”, page);
userService.createUser(new User(“Dummy”, 30));
mav.setViewName(“/index”);
return mav;
}